• non destructive services
  • non destructive services
  • non destructive services
case study
thomond park
case study
esb moneypoint
case study
rusal aughinish

non destructive services

dye penetrant inspection

Dye Penetrant Inspection (DPI), also called Liquid Penetrant Inspection (LPI), is a widely applied inspection method used to locate surface-breaking defects in all non-porous materials. The penetrant may be applied to all non-ferrous materials, but for inspection of ferrous components magnetic-particle inspection is preferred for its subsurface detection capability. LPI is used to detect casting and forging defects, cracks, and leaks in new products, and fatigue cracks on in-service components.

principles

DPI is based upon capillary action, where low surface tension fluid penetrates into clean and dry surface-breaking discontinuities. Penetrant may be applied to the test component by dipping, spraying, or brushing. After adequate penetration time has been allowed, the excess penetrant is removed, a developer is applied. The developer helps to draw penetrant out of the flaw where a visible indication becomes visible to the inspector. Inspection is performed under ultraviolet or white light, depending upon the type of dye used - fluorescent or non-fluorescent (visible).

materials

Penetrants are classified into sensitivity levels. Visible penetrants are typically red in color, and represent the lowest sensitivity. Fluorescent penetrants contain two or more dyes that fluoresce when excited by ultraviolet light. Since Fluorescent penetrant inspection is performed in a darkened environment, and the excited dyes emit brilliant yellow-green light that contrasts strongly against the dark background, this material is more sensitive to small defects.

When selecting a sensitivity level one must consider many factors, including the environment under which the test will be performed, the surface finish of the specimen, and the size of defects sought. One must also assure that the test chemicals are compatible with the sample so that the examination will not cause permanent staining, or degradation. This technique can be quite portable, because in its simplest form the inspection requires only 3 aerosol spray cans, some lint free towels, and adequate visible light. Stationary systems with dedicated application, wash, and development stations, are more costly and complicated, but result in better sensitivity.

inspection steps

01 Pre-cleaning

The test surface is cleaned to remove any dirt, paint, oil, grease or any loose scale that could either keep penetrant out of a defect, or cause irrelevant or false indications. Cleaning methods may include the use of solvents or vapor degreasing. The end goal of this step is a clean surface where any defects present are open to the surface, dry, and free of contamination.

02 Application of Penetrant

The penetrant is then applied to the surface of the item being tested. The penetrant is allowed time to soak into any flaws (generally 5 to 30 minutes). The dwell time mainly depends upon the penetrant being used, material being testing and the size of flaws sought. As expected, smaller flaws require a longer penetration time. Due to their incompatible nature one must be careful not to apply solvent-based penetrant to a surface which is to be inspected with a water-washable penetrant.

03 Excess Penetrant Removal

The excess penetrant is then removed from the surface. The removal method is controlled by the type of penetrant used. Water-washable, solvent-removable or post-emulsifiable, are the common choices. Emulsifiers represent the highest sensitivity level, and chemically interact with the oily penetrant to make it removable with a water spray. When using solvent remover and lint-free cloth it is important to not spray the solvent on the test surface directly, because this can then remove the penetrant from the flaws. This process must be performed under controlled conditions so that all penetrant on the surface is removed, but penetrants trapped in real defects remains in place.

04 Application of Developer

After excess penetrant has been removed a white developer is applied to the sample. Several developer types are available, including: non-aqueous wet developer, dry powder, water suspendable, and water soluble. Choice of developer is governed by penetrant compatibility and by inspection conditions. When using non-aqueous wet developer or dry powder, the sample must be dried prior to application, while soluble and suspendable developers are applied with the part still wet from the previous step. Non-aqueous wet developer is commercially available in aerosol spray cans, and may employ a propellant. Developer should form a semi-transparent, even coating on the surface. The developer draws penetrant from defects out onto the surface to form a visible indication, a process similar to the action of blotting paper. Any colored stains indicate the positions and types of defects on the surface under inspection.

05 Inspection

The inspector will use visible light with adequate intensity for visible dye penetrant. Ultraviolet lights of adequate intensity, along with low ambient light levels for fluorescent penetrant examinations. Inspection of the test surface should take place after a 10 minute development time. This time delay allows the blotting action to occur. The inspector may observe the sample for indication formation when using visible dye. Also of concern, if one waits too long after development, the indications may "bleed out" such that interpretation is hindered.

06 Post Cleaning

The test surface is often cleaned after inspection and recording of defects, especially if post-inspection coating processes are scheduled. Advantages and disadvantages The main advantages of DPI are the speed of the test and the low cost. The main disadvantages are that it only detects surface flaws and it does not work on very rough surfaces. Also, on certain surfaces a great enough color contrast cannot be achieved or the dye will stain the work piece Limited training is required for the operator, although experience is quite valuable. Proper cleaning is necessary to assure that surface contaminants have been removed and any defects present are clean and dry. Some cleaning methods have been shown to be detrimental to test sensitivity.

latest

news at wis

WIS have implemented and are now accredited to the following: EN ISO 9001:2015, EN ISO 14001:2015 and EN ISO 45001:2018.

WIS have attended courses and examinations at QSA-Global in Houston, Texas and now have technicians trained and qualified in Servicing & Maintenance of the QSA-Global equipment. WIS also have technicians trained and qualified in Source Retrieval, this entailed the actual retrieval of a live source, which other companies providing this service do not carry out. WIS intend to roll out these services to NDT Contractors nationwide.